/media/oembed?url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvucoSz1x2g&max_width=800&max_height=640&hash=-Ko16MXtMBshgiccNxT0wOS_SHfCK3LKmP0NIO0nOhY&oembed_lazyload=1&provider=YouTube&oembed_lazyload_hash=rPo50mZmEXtIusnfuXZDMZgo05hrNVPYt52yqGwHZXk#https://cepr.org/sites/default/files/styles/og_image/public/2023-10/Guido%20Friebel%20Thumbnail.png?itok=v-L9GKQ1,https://cepr.org/themes/nhsc-shared/nhsc_base/assets/img/default-social-share.png
# Use Youtube player (with Youtube AD) #<<<>>> # Use our player (Downlaod, Unblock & No Youtube AD) 再生できないときはここをクリック click hrer if failed to load 如无法播放请点击这里#

INFO:
Can acts of terror shift a country’s political landscape? Assessing both successful and failed terror attacks across German municipalities, Guido Friebel and Navid Sabet find that successful attacks lead to significant increases in the right-wing populist party’s vote share in state elections, despite the fact that most attacks were committed by right-wing nationalists against migrant communities. The study finds that media put emphasis on migration rather than on the right-wing activists to blame for the attacks. Transparency in who is committing terrorist attacks is important if we care about understanding and mitigating right-wing voting.
Does the far-right benefit from terrorism? | CEPR